360 Degree Feedback

  • Who do you see when you look in the mirror?
  • Not yourself, but your preferred image of yourself.
  • Is that really how others see you?
  • How can you improve if you think you are OK already?

The value of 360 degree feedback

  • Only feedback from others can reveal the true impact you make on people.
  • The thought of feedback can be scary, but is it better to remain in the dark?
  • Most managers are surprised by the amount of positive feedback they get.
  • This shows how many managers have low self esteem.
  • Your negative feedback can often be distilled down to a few manageable themes.
  • Negative feedback will show you what to focus on to develop yourself.
  • Avoid feedback and you cannot learn - you might as well stick your head in the sand.
  • A well designed 360 degree feedback process will help you to get realistic feedback.
  • Feedback questionnaires must be filled in anonymously by various colleagues, subordinates & other stakeholders.
  • A good questionnaire should include questions that are relevant to your culture and goals rather than off-the-shelf.
  • Allowing space for comments is more important than numerical ratings.
  • Feedback is essential to improve confidence and self esteem.
  • Your management effectiveness will be enhanced by knowing what you are doing well, not so well and how you might improve.
  • Being able to handle negative feedback is itself an important management skill - one that depends on your emotional intelligence, listening skills and willingness to learn.
  • 360 feedback is too often conducted as a one-off exercise. It is often done to managers when they should manage it themselves, just like a business seeking regular feedback from customers.

360 degree feedback

Who do you see when you look in the mirror?

Skills for Managing Effectively

Influencing Skills

Popular influencing styles:

  • Raw emotion - blow my top, make them cringe.
  • Rational persuasion - present facts and logic
  • Manipulation - pretend to involve them
  • Mental torture - pester until they give in
  • Inspiration - dramatize everything

More influencing styles - all popular!

  • Personal appeal -I draw on their loyalty or friendship.
  • Ingratiation - I flatter them, pay them compliments, butter them up.
  • Exchange - I do something for them in return, bribe them.
  • Pressure - I get tough, demand action, use threats, coerce them.
  • Legitimacy - I claim my rights, use my authority, cite the rules.
  • Coalitions - I gang up on them, get my pals on side, get political.
  • Packaging - I get liberal with the truth, exaggerate the upside.
  • Sulk - I pretend to be hurt or offended until I get sympathy.
  • Withdraw favours - I ignore them, cut them off, until they crack.
  • These influence styles reduce to three...

1. Be demanding!

  • Push people and you get short term gains and long term losses.
  • Pressure gets immediate action but damages your credibility.
  • The more fearful you make people the less useful they will be to you.
  • Force is just one way of failing.
  • Force only works when you are there to ENFORCE.
  • Hence your influence is limited to those you can see.
  • Force means regressing to childhood tactics.
  • Who can look up to a child?

2. Using reason to get your way

  • Works with disinterested or neutral parties because they have nothing at stake.
  • Reason is still pushy --- you're trying to change someone else's mind.
  • The more they have at stake in their position, the more you can be sure that reason will fail.
  • Reason is one-way communication, amounting to "telling" or "selling".
  • Asking people to "be reasonable" means asking them to see it your way.
  • Pure reasoning sticks strictly to facts and logic, stressing organizational benefits.
  • Reason becomes a bit more engaging when your arguments point out benefits to the other party.
  • Reason, of course, often works but don't limit yourself to this influence tactic only.

3. Involving others

  • This is the best approach, time permitting.
  • Real involvement means seeking mutual gains.
  • Start by trying to understand the other party's needs and interests.
  • The key to influencing through involvement is to ask questions. Do more asking than telling and selling.
  • Develop joint solutions with people rather than "reasoning" with them.
  • Full involvement generates the highest level of commitment.
  • Agreements are then negotiated rather than sold or imposed.
  • Involvement builds mutual respect and greater trust.
  • Involvement is harder work than pushing, telling and selling.
  • Full involvement is as rare as full maturity - it takes emotional intelligence.
  • More directive approaches only work when commitment is not important (when is that?

Add comment

No comments will be displayed until the Administrator approves them. No spam will be posted.


Security code
Refresh

AddThis Social Bookmark Button