|
|
Influencing
people
Popular influencing
styles:
- Raw
emotion - blow my top, make them cringe.
- Rational
persuasion - present facts and logic
- Manipulation
- pretend to involve them
- Mental
torture - pester until they give in
- Inspiration
- dramatize everything
|
|
|
More influencing
styles - all popular!
- Personal
appeal -I draw on their loyalty or friendship.
- Ingratiation
- I flatter them, pay them compliments, butter them up.
- Exchange
- I do something for them in return, bribe them.
- Pressure
- I get tough, demand action, use threats, coerce them.
- Legitimacy
- I claim my rights, use my authority, cite the rules.
- Coalitions
- I gang up on them, get my pals on side, get political.
- Packaging
- I get liberal with the truth, exaggerate the upside.
- Sulk -
I pretend to be hurt or offended until I get sympathy.
- Withdraw
favours - I ignore them, cut them off, until they crack.
- These
influence styles reduce to three...
1. Be
demanding!
- Push people
and you get short term gains and long term losses.
- Pressure
gets immediate action but damages your credibility.
- The more
fearful you make people the less useful they will be to you.
- Force
is just one way of failing.
- Force
only works when you are there to ENFORCE.
- Hence
your influence is limited to those you can see.
- Force
means regressing to childhood tactics.
- Who can
look up to a child?
2. Using reason to
get your way
- Works
with disinterested or neutral parties because they have nothing
at stake.
- Reason
is still pushy --- you're trying to change someone else's mind.
- The more
they have at stake in their position, the more you can be sure
that reason will fail.
- Reason
is one-way communication, amounting to "telling" or
"selling".
- Asking
people to "be reasonable" means asking them to see it
your way.
- Pure reasoning
sticks strictly to facts and logic, stressing organizational benefits.
- Reason
becomes a bit more engaging when your arguments point out benefits
to the other party.
- Reason,
of course, often works but don't limit yourself to this influence
tactic only.
3. Involving others
- This is
the best approach, time permitting.
- Real involvement
means seeking mutual gains.
- Start
by trying to understand the other party's needs and interests.
- The key
to influencing through involvement is to ask questions. Do more
asking than telling and selling.
- Develop
joint solutions with people rather than "reasoning"
with them.
- Full involvement
generates the highest level of commitment.
- Agreements
are then negotiated rather than sold or imposed.
- Involvement
builds mutual respect and greater trust.
- Involvement
is harder work than pushing, telling and selling.
- Full involvement
is as rare as full maturity - it takes emotional intelligence.
- More directive
approaches only work when commitment is not important (when is
that?).
All
pages written by Mitch
McCrimmon, Ph.D. and copyright © Self Renewal Group 1996-2010
|
|
Shop
here for books from Amazon
Recent articles:
Beyond
Folk Leadership Four
Levels of Employee Engagement
Leadership
for the Creative Class
Why
Emotional Intelligence is not Essential for Leadership
Three
ways of defining leadership
Leadership
Traits: Three Perspectives
How
to Define Leadership and Management
The
Leadership of the Outsider
The
Changing Meaning of Leadership

|
|