There
is no sharp disctinction between leadership and management.
They
occupy positions of authority.
Leadership
is a formal role.
They
make strategic decisions.
They
are good at managing people.
They
have emotional intelligence.
They
sell the tickets for a new journey AND take the group to
the destination.
Leadership
= promoting new directions.
Management
= getting things done.
All
employees can promote new directions.
Leadership
can be shown bottom-up or sideways to people who don't report
to you.
Leadership
has nothing to do with managing people - that's management.
Leaders
don't make decisions. The ACT of leadership is one of pure
informal influence.
Leaders
sell the tickets for the journey, Managers drive the bus
to the destination.
The Changing Meaning
of Leadership
Leadership
has always been based on power. For the conventional view, this
means the power of personality to dominate a group.
But in
our knowledge driven world, business is a war of ideas where the
power to innovate and promote new products is the new basis of
leadership.
Anyone
with critical knowledge that could alter business direction can
show leadership. This is thought
leadership.
It can
be shown by front line employees who don't manage anyone.
It can
be bottom-up as well as top-down. It can even come from outside.
It can be shown between organizations too as in market leadership.
Only management
is a formal role.
Leadership
re-invented is an occasional ACT, like creativity, not a role
or position.
Those
at the top sometimes lead, sometimes just manage. Other times
they operate as venture capitalists investing in the best ideas
(leadership) emerging from below.
Leadership
is based on youthful rebelliousness, the drive of young people
to challenge the status quo and find a better way.
Bottom-up
or thought leadership is more like the actions of Martin Luther
King Jr. than business leadership. His demonstrations had a leadership
impact on policy makers in the U.S. government and, of course,
they did not report to him.
This shows
that leadership is really just about taking a stand for what you
believe and trying to convince people to think and act differently.
Conventional
theories paint a distorted picture of leadership by focusing narrowly
on people in positions of power. These theories are in crisis today
because they face an unpalatable dilemma: either they have to say
that CEOs no longer lead or they have to change the meaning of leadership.
The latter option states that leadership now means being a facilitator,
like the level 5 leaders of Jim Collins who grill top people with
questions designed to elicit ideas for new directions from them.
This option preserves the idea that CEOs are leaders. Another option
is to retain the older notion that leaders promote new directions
but to say that CEOs no longer have a monopoly on leadership. By
saying that leadership means promoting new directions, such as new
products and services, we open the door to everyone being able to
show leadership. This means that CEOs manage as much as lead. But
to make sense of this move, we need to upgrade management, to make
it a more positive concept. At present, management is cast in a
negative light. Explore these pages to learn more about how and
why our understanding of leadership needs to change.
The
Level 5 Leadership idea developed by Jim Collins is the greatest
irony in modern thinking about leadership. Recognizing that CEOs
no longer have all the answers, Collins has shifted the goal posts.
Leadership now means, according to Collins, drawing ideas for new
directions out of your best people. This move preserves the myth
that the CEO is the leader but the cost is that leaders no longer
provide direction. Surely the reality is that CEOs can no longer
provide all the leadership an organization needs. If we retain the
idea that leadership = promoting new directions, then it is something
all employees can do regardless of position. With a view of leadership
so re-invented, we have to say that much of what CEOs do should
be classed as management. The level 5 leaders of Jim Collins, when
they use facilitative skills to draw new directions out of others,
are really wearing a managerial hat, not showing leadership by other
means.