Organizational metaphors

  • Ship metaphor - welcome newcomers on board.
  • As in running a "tight ship"
  • But a ship knows its direction before it sets sail.
  • Ships have a clear direction from start to finish because their destination is not a moving target, unlike business today where direction cannot be fully decided in advance and it can change constantly.

Is your organization a ...machine?
...organism?
...person?
...group?
...family?

...dynasty?

  • Also, on a ship, the captain decides direction.
  • The ship metaphor does not fit very well with empowerment.
  • If it is operating subconsciously in your business it may be blocking empowerment.
  • Your metaphors determine how you think organizations should behave.
  • The ship metaphor was OK in the old days when we could sail towards a destination that was not shifting as we sailed.
  • Today, this metaphor is comforting but dangerous - not only is the destination shifting, but you have to make it up as you go!
  • When you think about how best to manage your organization, question your underlying metaphors to ensure they fit with your environmental demands.
  • What metaphors determine your thinking about organizations?

Organizations as machines

  • The machine metaphor appeals to minds that like orderliness - such as engineers.
  • It also ties in with business process re-engineering.
  • Any business requiring a high level of efficiency is essentially a machine.
  • MacDonald's and similar service businesses are examples - they offer the same product
    everywhere all the time at minimum cost and maximum quality - this is machine-like.
  • Machines can only be repaired or replaced, they cannot evolve or develop.
  • We cannot dispense with this metaphor - contrary to the advocates of adaptiveness.
  • All businesses need to deliver today's products efficiently as well as adapt to the future.
  • So, all businesses will have a relatively machine-like part.
  • Those that compete solely on cost, service and quality, not on innovation, need to be machine-like in their efficiency.
  • Problems arise when managers insist on employing only one fundamental metaphor.
  • Even fast evolving businesses need to be machine-like if they are to be profitable.

Organizations as organisms

  • Organisms, like businesses, compete for survival and evolve to gain an edge.
  • An organism is responsive to its environment, it can learn and adapt.
  • Like organisms, businesses are born, grow and die.
  • Organisms are more receptive to environmental feedback than machines.
  • Businesses also operate within a delicate ecology with a lot of interdependencies.
  • It's not as clear who's in charge of an organism as it is with a ship, however.
  • Do businesses have no more control over their fate than animals facing evolutionary pressure?
  • Entrepreneurial organizations grow more by evolution than rational planning.
  • Perhaps businesses have both machine-like and organism-like characteristics.
  • Thinking of your business as an organism may encourage a stronger external focus.
  • Organisms look to their environments while being a machine encourages internal tinkering.

Organizations as persons

  • This metaphor captures the idea that organizations have brains.
  • Senior management consitutes the brain of the organization.
  • This idea is O.K. in businesses where all the thinking is done only at the top.
  • Like other organisms, persons grow and develop, learn and adapt.
  • But they also get old and set in their ways!
  • It makes sense to talk of persons forming partnerships and cooperating with other firms.
  • We like to think of organizations as having a personality, character or moods.
  • We attribute personality traits to organizations - like integrity or openness.
  • Organizations can also be neurotic, immature or unfit - just like people.

Organizations as groups

  • This metaphor sheds light on the reality of competing factions and stakeholders.
  • But, we run the risk of excessive internal focus again - as with machines.
  • Only groups can be teams and this is a major benefit of this metaphor.
  • What's less inspiring is just the fact that "group" is not really a metaphor.
  • An organization IS a group in a way that it can never be a machine or an organism
  • You could substitute the metaphor of an army or beehive - both types of groups;
  • How about a group of pirates or explorers? The latter ties in with entrepreneurship.
  • Explorers are discoverers who need to improvise, adapt and break new ground.
  • What happens to routine execution, administration and efficiency in such a culture, however?

Organizations as families

  • Conflicts in organizations are a lot like family conflicts.
  • This metaphor can shed light on otherwise confusing dynamics.
  • It also ties in with the paternalistic character of some organizations.
  • Authority in organizations is a lot like the authority in families.
  • We often want to rebel against organizational authority for the same reason.
  • We refer to hiring people as ''getting into bed with them''.
  • Our relationship to our employer is often thought of as a marriage.
  • Like marriage, joining an organization used to be a lifetime commitment.
  • Talking to other prospective employers is seen as disloyal - like having an affair!
  • Manager - subordinate relationships are very much like parent - child relationships.
  • Executives often want their favourite ''son'' to follow in their footsteps.
  • We often like to work somewhere that has a family atmosphere.
  • It is hard to rejoin an organization if you leave - as with divorce you are a traitor!

Organizations as family dynasties

  • The family dynasty metaphor makes sense of decentralized conglomerates.
  • The parent organization acquires offspring or spins them off as new divisions.
  • It is also conducive to images of successions of generations taking control.
  • And of decentralized divisions wanting the independence to run their own lives.
  • Viewing divisions as children in need of support is also quite paternalistic, however.
  • As if a business has to be protected until sufficiently mature to be let to run itself.
  • Often it is "parental" interference that destroys an "offspring's" chances of success.
  • This metaphor suggests a certain rigidity and resistance to change.
  • What counts in a family dynasty is tradition, maintaining links with the past, respect for elders, continuity - everything but dynamic change to meet future challenges.

See ''Skills to Manage'' for managerial skills.

 

All pages written by Mitch McCrimmon, Ph.D. and copyright © Self Renewal Group 1996-2010

 

 

Home
Quizzes
Site map
Contact

Shop here for books from Amazon

Recent articles:

Beyond Folk Leadership

Four Levels of Employee Engagement

Leadership for the Creative Class

Why Emotional Intelligence is not Essential for Leadership

Three ways of defining leadership

Leadership Traits: Three Perspectives

How to Define Leadership and Management

The Leadership of the Outsider

The Changing Meaning of Leadership