- Vision can motivate without providing direction.
- The emotionally expressed intention to be the best XYZ is inspiring.
- It gives us something to believe in, work towards, and identify with.
- But a vision doesn't always provide direction, what to do differently.
- There is managerial vision and leadership vision.
- The former motivates performance improvement; this isn't leadership.
- Visionary leadership paints an inspiring picture of what an organization can become.
- It points towards a new future, a change in direction, and hence provides leadership.
- A vision dramatizes new directions that others might not buy into otherwise.
- Vision is hence a useful influence tactic for prospective followers who are resistant to change and who find vivid pictures or images inspiring.
- Vision, however, is not essential to leadership simply because there are other influence tactics available and because people differ in terms of their receptivity to change.
- setting an example is a form of leadership without vision.
- simply pointing to a new direction is enough to influence opportunists.
- To inspire change, a vision needs to be concrete, not just motherhood statements.
- It should point to what needs to be done by when and should differentiate you from competitors - otherwise you have provided a statement of values, not a vision.
- Wanting to provide the best customer service in the business is a value statement.
- Attaining a measurable lead on this value in your market in 3 years is a vision.
- However, if you are just trying to be a bit better on several dimensions at what you are already doing, then this borders on being a managerial vision.
- A true leadership vision advocates a more substantive change in direction.
- It depends on your starting point - minor changes suggests a managerial challenge. If you are currently in the dark ages on customer service, then it's a leadership task.
Is Vision Essential for Leadership?
- Some think so. They say that even small ideas like suggesting a modification on a product is based on an implicit vision if not an explicit one.
- But this is stretching the concept of vision to meaninglessness.
- Surely, leading by example is not based on a vision.
- Nor is leading in a crisis.
- The truth is that a vision is required in certain situations, but not others. It is helpful where a large-scale challenge needs to be surmounted in a tight time-frame, like J.F. Kennedy's vision of putting a man on the moon by the end of the 1960's.
- But an everyday drive to improve profitability by X% is hardly visionary.
See my latest article on this topic: Vision and Leadership where I criticize at length the notion that you must have a vision to lead. Do you think leadership should be redefined for a 21st century world? Is it possible that our current concept of leadership is not working? Is there room for heroic leadership today or is it now all about post-heroic leadership? Is emotional intelligence always essential for leadership? Is leadership a role, like being a CEO?
|


Challenging conventional thinking about leadership
See LEAD2XL for all new articles on leadership by Mitch McCrimmon
Visit: Leadersdirect Blog
|